The Notebooks

The Yellow Notebook

Online
UK Edition
US Edition

Comments

Previous page
with comments

<<

See all
comments

Go

Next page
with comments

>>

After some weeks, she heard from Dr West, apparently casually, though with a hidden triumphant malice, that Paul had gone back to Nigeria again. ‘His wife wouldn’t go with him,’ said Dr West. ‘She doesn’t want to uproot herself. Perfectly happy where she is, apparently.’

The trouble with this story is that it is written in terms of analysis of the laws of dissolution of the relationship between Paul and Ella. I don’t see any other way to write it. As soon as one has lived through something, it falls into a pattern. And the pattern of an affair, even one that has lasted five years and has been as close as a marriage, is seen in terms of what ends it. That is why all this is untrue. Because while living through something one doesn’t think like that at all.

Supposing I were to write it like this: two full days, in every detail, one at the beginning of the affair, and one towards the end? No, because I would still be instinctively isolating and emphasizing the factors that destroyed the affair. It is that which would give the thing its shape. Otherwise it would be chaos, because these two days, separated by many months in time, would have no shadow over them, but would be records of a simple unthinking happiness with perhaps a couple of jarring moments — which in fact would be reflections of the approaching end but which would not be felt like that at the time — moments swallowed in the happiness.

Literature is analysis after the event.

The form of that other piece, about what happened in Mashopi, is nostalgia. There is no nostalgia in this piece, about Paul and Ella, but the form is a kind of pain.

To show a woman loving a man one should show her cooking a meal for him or opening a bottle of wine for the meal, while she waits for his ring at the door. Or waking in the morning before he does to see his face change from the calm of sleep into a smile of welcome. Yes. To be repeated a thousand times. But that isn’t literature. Probably better as a film. Yes, the physical quality of life, that’s living, and not the analysis afterwards, or the moments of discord or premonition. A shot in a film: Ella slowly peeling an orange, handing Paul yellow segments of the fruit, which he takes, one after another, thoughtfully, frowning: he is thinking of something else.

The Notebooks

The Yellow Notebook

Online
UK Edition
US Edition

Bookmarks

What is this?

You last read
Page

Go

You last bookmarked
Page

Go

Bookmark currentBookmarked!
Page 188

Go

One Comment

  1. Harriet Rubin November 25th, 2008 at 8:19 am

    How to write a love story?
    The Yellow Notebook has taken me by surprise. The aborted relationship between Ella and Paul, Ella’s lack of will to control her destiny, Paul’s self-knowledge of his flaws–it’s all riveting and told, as Lessing says, without sentiment or a wasted word. Lessing does something shocking here: she holds the mirror up to the reader by describing her characters’ doomed affair and then by describing what it is to write about a doomed affair. This self scrutiny led me, in my reading, to ask myself: why I am so intrigued by this story of pain and dissolution? There is no hiding from yourself while reading this book.

    I thought too of that other reader who is shadowing me as I read these pages: what did Obama observe in reading this notebook: If he hadn’t already had a vision of how politics may be the only pure love–Lessing calls it “service”–this notebook would have shown him how politics is love writ large through small deeds. Hannah Arendt’s phrase applies: “amour mundi,” love of the world. We are our best in amour mundi. Good politics redefines family to mean community. Ella and Paul are at their best, I think, when they are unselfconsciously engaged in a form of service, Ella struggling to write helpful letters to sufferers who read her women’s magazine, and Paul going to Nigeria to do practical doctoring, even to sacrifice Ella and his wife to his new found cause. It’s clear he was capable of loving neither woman, but devoted to a cause, he is capable of loving.

    Is political engagement the truest love one can offer?